|
Presentation : The EA Process and What We Accomplished
Submission to EA Expert Review Panel 2005
The WWLC has reviewed the documents which CWS submits to the
Environmental Assessment Study Group. Following are those reviews.
If CWS provides adequate time and opportunity, we present our comments
and questions at the EASG meetings. Otherwise, we submit them in writing to CWS, members of the EASG, and
eventually to the Ministry of Environment. We hope that our comments influence the process and CWS's proposal. For CWS's responses
to our reviews, please check their Final Documents.
Document #1
WWLC Comments on Document #1 Public Consultation
Outstanding Issues
Document #2
WWLC Comments on Document #2 Proposed Criteria and Indicators for the Assessment of Alternatives
Document #3
WWLC Review of Document #3: Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives
Document #4
We think the CWS consultation process on Doc. #4 was flawed
and inadequate. Here is our report to CWS:
WWLC Comments on Document #4 Impact Assessment Process
CWS disagreed with our view, and here is their response:
CWS response to our review of Document #4
And then we replied to their response.
WWLC Replies to CWS: Consultation on Doc. #4 is Flawed and Inadequate
WWLC Comments on Agency and PRT Review of Document #4
WWLC Comments on Appendix to Document #4
CWS has responded only to our review of the public consultation process
Document #4.
Document # 5
WWLC Comments on Document #5: Baseline Conditions
Document # 6 Site Design
WWLC Comments on Document #6: Site Design (partial)
|
